The technique of transfer and the length of time required before pedicle division depend on the nature of the flap and the contact surface. Surgical technique the posterior tibial vessels of the contralateral leg were prepared as recipient vessels for all patients. With the introduction of perforator flap, management of small and mediumsize defects of distal leg and ankle region is convenient. A cross leg flap was performed stabilizing both lower limbs with an external fixator.
Evolution of local perforator flaps in lower extremity. An alternative method to free flap for distal leg and foot. Buchan ac 1978 the place of the crossleg flap in reconstructive surgery of the lower leg and foot. Transplantation treatment of extensive softtissue defects.
Soft tissue coverage of distal leg and ankle region represents a challenge and such defect usually requires a free flap. Moreover, a cross leg flap does not require microsurgical capabilities and can be performed with basic equipment. The purpose of this report is to introduce the cross. Cross leg free muscle flaps of large volume such as the. However, the situation occasionally arises in which an alternative method may be. We describe our experience with crossleg flap in 18 patients for the reconstruction of difficult leg defects in which no suitable recipient vessels were available for microvascular. Hence, medially based standard cross leg flap was planned for covering the exposed tibia. The versatility of perforatorbased propeller flap for.
Posttraumatic wounds of the lower leg with soft tissue defects and exposed fractures are a reconstructive challenge due to the scarce availability of local tissues and recipient vessels. All patients had satisfactory and stable reconstruction. The use of external fixator for immobilization circumvents many of these problems and facilitates the use of cross leg flaps in patients in whom free tissue transfer may not be optimal. The design and harvest of combined flap consisted of anterolateral thigh perforator flap and thoracic umbilical flap a. Stark1950 standardized the procedure and summarized its usefulness for lower extremities trauma. In wellselected cases, flaps can play a pivotal role in optimizing outcomes in the acute phase of burns. Original article distal perforator based cross leg flaps. Even in tertiary care centers cross leg flaps is a viable procedure in failed free flap surgeries. Because the crossleg flap, which is located in a lower rung of the reconstructive ladder, is less technically demanding, demonstrates greater safety, and could provide different types of tissue for repairing complex defects, we prefer to use the crossleg flap first instead of a free flap for reconstruction of traumatic lower extremities when local flaps are not available. All three defects were covered with a medially based narrow pedicled triangular cross leg flap based on 23 adjacent posterior tibial perforators about 12 cm from the medial border of the tibia in its middle.
Crossleg as salvage procedure after free flaps transfer failure. A crossleg free rectus abdominis flap, anastomosing to utilized carrier vessels of the contralateral noninjured leg, was used for reconstruction in six cases of. Crossleg flaps are a good choice for reconstructing traumatized lower extremities, especially when free flaps cannot be used. Cross leg flaps for lower limb wound coverage have been replaced by free tissue transfer in the last two decades. Chromoblastomycosis is a chronic infectious disease of the skin characterized by nodular, verrucous, or cauliflowerlike lesions. Reconstruction of large defects can only be achieved with microsurgical procedures. Versatility of a cross leg free rectus abdominis flap for leg reconstruction under difficult and unfavorable conditions. Since the crossleg flap was first described by ham ilton in 1874,1 it was the. When harvesting the osteocutaneous flap, the septum is harvested in continuity with the paddle of skin and fascia of the lateral leg. Standard cross leg flap, still a work horse for compound.
The crossleg free flap procedure was first described by taylor et al. Even when a free tissue transfer can be performed the risk of failure remains considerable. This is quite relevant because the highest percentage of failure of free flaps is encountered in cases of resurfacing the traumatic defects of the distal leg and foot. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with crossleg free. The traditional cross leg reconstruction used a random patterned flap with a wide base, making the flap vulnerable to ischemia and venous insufficiency.
Distal perforator based cross leg flaps for leg and foot defects. A new and safer anastomosis technique in crossleg free flap procedure using the dorsalis pedis arterial system. Crossleg flaps for lower limb wound coverage have been replaced by free tissue transfer in the last two decades. The details of each case are summarized in table 1. Large ulcers around the heel region are common but difficult problems because the usual methods of resurfacing are unsatisfactory. In crosssection, the interosseous membrane is seen in green, spanning from the tibia to the fibula. However, there are certain difficult situations where the free flap cannot be employed and alternative methods. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with crossleg free flaps.
We report the case of a patient with full thickness burns on both legs, leading to the exposure of joints of the right ankle and the right foot and left patellar. Revisiting the fasciocutaneous perforator crossleg flap ncbi. Because the crossleg flap, which is located in a lower rung of the reconstructive ladder fig. In this technique, the vascular pedicle of the free flap is temporarily anastomosed to the recipient vessels of the contralateral leg and then detached after obtaining sufficient revascularization of the flap. The technique of muscle transposition in the operative treatment of traumatic and ulcerative lesions of the leg.
Table 1 demographics of three distinct cases describing the modified cross leg flap for large triangular defects of the foot and ankle. An alternative method to free flap for distal leg and foot defects due to electrical burn injury. Background crossleg free flaps have been described for reconstruction of leg defects in cases of trauma with no suitable recipient vessels in the vicinity of the defect. Use of a crossleg free muscle flap to reconstruct an extensive burn wound involving a lower extremity. Surgeons have long sought an alternative to the crossleg flap.
Limb salvage in an irradiated patient with limited recipient vessels leaves few options for reconstruction. The gracilis muscle is located in the inner aspect of the thigh. A small portion of this a small portion of this muscle with its blood supply artery and vein and nerve can be transplanted in the face to replace the facial muscles. Preserving the blood flow of the recipient artery in cross. Four days following free flap reconstruction of his right leg, the patient was discharged to the plastic surgery ward where he continued to improve with no complications regarding his free flap reconstruction and 95% take of the skin graft covering the flap. When there is no suitable vessel in the injured leg for microsurgical transfer, crossleg free flaps can be considered for lower extremity reconstruction. The primary goal in limb salvage is definite wound closure by using appropriate flaps.
Cinpolat, md2 gamze bektas, md2 arzu akcal, md1 harun simsek, md1 polat bicici, md1 seckin ayd. The cross leg flap is a safer, less complicated technique that allows for better matching of skin color, texture, and thickness, reduced operative time, and less donor site morbidity than distal free flaps. We present the first documented case of a crossleg free flap for limb salvage in a radiated bed after infection and. Among the methods for reconstructing defects of the lower extremities, there are direct closure, skin grafting, and local flaps including the muscle flap, crossleg flap and free flap. Crossleg free flaps for difficult cases of leg defects.
In order to reconstruct very extensive defects, the free crossleg flap and the free cable bridge flap have been described. Twelve cases of such ulcers were covered with medial plantar vascular pedicled flaps and the results had been excellent. The lateral intermuscular septum separates the lateral compartment muscles from the soleus. However, there are certain difficult situations where the free flap cannot be employed and alternative methods are needed. Repair of a wide lower extremity defect with crossleg. The crossleg flap technique is a wellestablished method to cover soft. The cross leg fasciocutaneous flaps are less frequently indicated for distal leg and foot. Crossleg free flaps have been used to reconstruct defects that would otherwise lead to amputation in patients with no ipsilateral recipient vessels. However, with the advent of microvascular surgery and the introduction of the free flap in 1970, use of the crossleg flap and other distant flaps declined.
Crossleg repair of large softtissue defects in distal. Twentyseven crossleg free flap transfers were performed. We report a case of a male with a severe posttraumatic wound of the lower leg with. The pitfalls, however, have not been well documented in the literature. Good local tissue coverage was not available and free tissue transfer. In order to reconstruct very extensive defects, the free cross leg flap and the free cable bridge flap have been described.
Composite tissue loss in extremities involving neurovascular structures has been a major challenge for reconstructive surgeons. Pedicled crossleg flaps, journal of the american college. Use of the medial plantar flap in soft tissue replacement. When compared with the conventional cross leg flaps the discomfort, cross legging, joint stiffness and sore development are minimal. Free flap reconstruction following lower leg trauma in the. Extension from the skin to the subcutaneous tissues occurs at times, and, although the infection usually is confined to the lower extremities, it may involve the hands and arms. The traditional crossleg reconstruction used a random patterned flap with a wide base, making the flap.
We report a case of a male with a severe posttraumatic wound of the lower leg with exposed tibia fracture firstly treated with two consecutive latissimus dorsi muscular free flaps, failed for vascular thrombosis. Crossleg free flap for limb salvage in the setting of. Standard cross leg flap, still a work horse for compound fracture leg bones with extensive soft tissue damage. The operative technique used was the standard approach so elegantly. A previous redundant flap could be reused or recycled as a donor site from which a new flap could be raised. Noordhoff ms, tang y 1997 crossleg free flaps for difficult cases of legs defects. Compared with a crossleg or crossbridge free flap, a distally based posterior tibial artery crossbridge flap is reliable and versatile, leading to shorter operation duration and a lower risk of. A new and safer anastomosis technique in crossleg free. Pedicled crossextremity flaps for lower limb wound coverage have been replaced by free tissue transfer in the last two decades. Pedicled crossleg flaps pedicled crossleg flaps halls, michael j. Pdf repair of bilateral lower limb injuries using a free.
In this article, we present our experience in the treatment of traumatic lower extremity wounds by using crossleg flaps. Retrograde cross leg perforator flaps are reliable option in cases of failed free flaps, unavailable ipsilateral proximal tissue, damaged distal perforators and distal most defects of foot. Crossleg flap is still a useful tool for leg wound coverage even in microsurgical unit in situations precluding free flap coverage. However, the crossleg flap remains an effective alternative in situations that require an alternative to free tissue transfer. Eight cross leg free flap reconstructions were performed. A new and safer anastomosis technique in crossleg free flap procedure using the dorsalis pedis arterial system topalan, murat m. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with cross leg free flaps ozlenen ozkan, md1 an.
The crossleg flap became widely popular during world war ii as a limb salvage technique to treat injuries sustained in battle. Both patients showed a satisfactory recovery returning to walk without additional help. It is suggested as an alternative method to a difficult cross. When a free flap is contraindicated or after a free flap failure, the crossleg flap is still nowadays a possible option. When a free flap is contraindicated or after a free flap failure, the crossleg flap is still nowadays a possible. Microsurgery information for surgeons, health care professionals and patients, with detailed procedure descritpions. However, this may lead to considerable donor site morbidity, is time consuming, and needs facility of microsurgery. Repair of bilateral lower limb injuries using a free latissimus dorsi crossleg flap. Crossleg as salvage procedure after free flaps transfer. The records of all patients who had cross leg flap for trauma in the last 2. Pdf repair of a wide lower extremity defect with cross. The cross leg free flap procedure was first described by taylor et al.
230 1160 1316 827 1463 143 297 625 24 9 928 628 1300 515 1231 909 1185 575 119 1224 532 631 777 533 1536 1143 1074 1268 1041 1203 943 1409 1295 1329 27 685 1275 1133 1050 589 89 690